<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for MORTGAGES VANCOUVER</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mortgagevancouver.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mortgagevancouver.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Tips, Advice, and Explanations from a Vancouver Mortgage Broker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 03:04:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Fixed Rate or Variable Rate Mortgage &#8211; Which is Best? by maybbq</title>
		<link>http://mortgagevancouver.wordpress.com/2008/11/23/fixed-rate-or-variable-rate-mortgage-which-is-best/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>maybbq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 03:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mortgagevancouver.wordpress.com/?p=171#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Agreed. If there is only 4.9% 5-year fix and p+1% variable to choose from, I prefer the fixed. Although there might be another small cut next month, P wouldn&#039;t go below 3% in next 2 years, but likely up to 5 or higher later. 
However, by far I am still comfortable with my current p-2.3 (after the first 3 months p-0.65 variable 6 years term, that is, after January 2009). Variable is like gambling, having fun when rate cuts but hurts otherwise :)
No one knows how it goes after 6 years, maybe then fixed rates getting higher again (comparing to variable)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. If there is only 4.9% 5-year fix and p+1% variable to choose from, I prefer the fixed. Although there might be another small cut next month, P wouldn&#8217;t go below 3% in next 2 years, but likely up to 5 or higher later.<br />
However, by far I am still comfortable with my current p-2.3 (after the first 3 months p-0.65 variable 6 years term, that is, after January 2009). Variable is like gambling, having fun when rate cuts but hurts otherwise <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
No one knows how it goes after 6 years, maybe then fixed rates getting higher again (comparing to variable)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bank of Canada Lowers Prime Rate &#8211; Banks do Not Follow by j2eeblogger</title>
		<link>http://mortgagevancouver.wordpress.com/2008/10/08/bank-of-canada-lowers-prime-rate-banks-do-not-follow/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>j2eeblogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 20:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mortgagevancouver.wordpress.com/?p=130#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Nice article. Hope the credit crunch can be solved effectively or the whole world is gonna hurt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article. Hope the credit crunch can be solved effectively or the whole world is gonna hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
